E-ISSN: 1305-9327 ISSN: 1305-9319
The Fate of the Syndesmosis Screw in Syndesmotic Injuries
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Research
VOLUME: 15 ISSUE: 1
P: 69-75
March 2019

The Fate of the Syndesmosis Screw in Syndesmotic Injuries

Med J Bakirkoy 2019;15(1):69-75
DOI: 10.4274/BTDMJB.galenos.2019.20181128085002
Emre Baca
Burak Belen
1. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi , Ortopedi ve Travmotoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 28.11.2018
Accepted Date: 18.01.2019
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective:

Ankle fractures are common orthopedic injuries. Some ankle fractures are associated with syndesmotic injuries and surgical treatment is indicated. Screw fixation is the gold standard in fixation of syndesmosis rupture. However, there are different opinions about this technique in terms of application and follow-up. The present literature suggests that it should be removed in 6-8th weeks, some recent publications and surgeon opinions suggest that screws need not be removed. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of patients with retained and removed syndesmosis screws.

Methods:

Thirty-one patients with syndesmosis fixation were retrospectively reviewed. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. In the clinical evaluation, Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and visual pain scale (VAS) were used. The final state of the screw (removed, fractured, intact) was evaluated by standard AP and lateral radiographs. Ankle range of motion was measured by goniometer.

Results:

A total of 33 patients were included in the study. Syndesmosis screw was removed in 39.4% (n=13) of the cases and it was observed that 60.6% (n=20) had not been removed. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion:

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with retained or removed syndesmosis screws. Given the cost and workload associated with secondary surgery, increased complication risk and loss of patient workforce, we do not recommend routine removal of the syndesmosis screw.

References

1
Citak M, Backhaus M, Muhr G, Kalicke T et al Distal tibial fracture post syndesmotic screw removal:an adverse complicationArch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Oct;131(10):1405-8
2
Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C et al Functional andradiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation:implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):2-6
3
Trapper A.J. Lalli, Leslie J. Matthews, Andrew E. Hanselman, David F. Hubbard,Michelle A. Bramer, Robert D. Santrock Economic impact of syndesmosis hardware removalFoot (Edinb). 2015 Sep;25(3):131-3
4
Hamid N, Loeffler BJ, Braddy W, Kellam JF, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ. Outcomeafter fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: theeffect of the syndesmosis screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):1069-73
5
Schepers T. To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: areview of literature. ArchOrthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jul;131(7):879-83
6
Huber T, Schmoelz W, Bolderl A. Motion of a fibula relative to the tibia and its alterations with syndesmosis screws: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Surg 2012;18(3):203–9
7
Schepers T, van der Linden H, van Lieshout EMM, Niesten D-D, van der Elst M. Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Injury 2014;45(4):775–9.
8
Van den Bekerom MPJ, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW, van Dijk CN. Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: review of current concepts. Injury 2008; 39(4):491–8.
9
Kaftandziev I, Spasov M, Trpeski S, Zafirova-Ivanovska B, Bakota B. Fate of the syndesmotic screw--Search for a prudent solution. Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S125-9.